VIDEO: Sen. Ted Cruz Completely Unloads On AG Merrick Garland, Takes Him To The Woodshed On Why He Dodged Critical Question

VIDEO: Sen. Ted Cruz Completely Unloads On AG Merrick Garland, Takes Him To The Woodshed On Why He Dodged Critical Question

Sen. Ted Cruz took a proverbial wooden paddle to the backside of Attorney General Merrick Garland during a Judiciary Committee hearing held on Wednesday concerning allegations that the Biden Justice Department has been transformed into a weapon that is being utilized to go after political opponents.

advertisement — content continues below

A very heated Cruz continually pressed Garland concerning a memo that he sent out to the FBI following a letter from the National School Boards Association that made the suggestion that the actions of some parents who were upset over school policies were similar to domestic terrorism.

Cruz also took it to Garland over whether or not he sought an ethics opinion over what could end up being a potential conflict-of-interest involving his son-in-law who makes quite a pretty penny of making woke materials for schools.

advertisement — content continues below

take our poll - story continues below

Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?

  • Who would you vote for if the elections were held today?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Ken Blackwell updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

via Daily Wire:

SEN. TED CRUZ (R-TX): For eight years under Barack Obama, the Department of Justice was politicized and weaponized. When you came before this committee in your confirmation hearing, you promised things would be different. I asked you specifically, quote, “Will you commit to this committee that under your leadership, the Department of Justice will not target the political opponents of this administration?” Here was your answer, quote, “absolutely. It’s totally inappropriate for the department to target any individual because of their politics or their position in a campaign.” That was your promise just a few months ago. I’m sorry to say you have broken that promise. There is a difference between law and politics. And General Garland, you know the difference between law and politics. Law is based on facts; it is impartial; it is not used as a tool of political retribution. This memo was not law. This memo was politics. On Wednesday, September 29, the National School Board Association wrote a letter to the president asking the president to use the Department of Justice to target parents that were upset at Critical Race Theory, that were upset at mask mandates in schools, to target them as domestic terrorists. On the face of the letter, the letter was in repeated consultation with the White House, in explicit political consultation with the White House, that was on Wednesday, September 29. Five days later, on Monday, so right after the weekend, boom, you pop out a memo giving them exactly what they want. Now, by the way, I understand that, in politics, that happens all the time. An important special interest wants something, sir, yes, sir. We’re going to listen to him. Let me ask you something, General Garland. In the letter, which you told the House of Representatives was the basis for this abusive memo targeting parents, how many incidents are cited in that memo?

advertisement — content continues below

MERRICK GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL: I have to look back through the memo, I [inaudible]–

CRUZ: Okay, you don’t know. How many of them were violent?

GARLAND: Again, the general report–

CRUZ: How many of them were violent? Do you know?

GARLAND: I don’t know.

“You don’t know. And there’s a reason you don’t know. Because you didn’t care and nobody in your office cared to find out. I did a quick count just sitting here during this hearing. I counted 20 incidents cited. Of the 20, 15 on their face are non-violent. They involve things like insults, they involve a Nazi salute. That’s one of the examples, ‘My God, a parent did a Nazi salute at a school board because he thought the policies were oppressive.’ General Garland, is doing a Nazi salute at an elected official, is that protected by the First Amendment?” Cruz continued.

“Yes, it is,” Garland replied.

Check out the video above for the whole interaction. The fireworks between these two is spectacular. You won’t regret watching it.